Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Growing Pains

A pair of truly horrific building related calamities in the world's two most populous countries this week. First, a high rise fire killed 53 people in Shanghai, a city of 20 million that has seen an explosion of construction in recent years, and unsound building practices seem to be the culprit:
Chinese police are holding four suspects after a Shanghai apartment fire that killed 53 people and injured 70 others was blamed on unlicensed welding, state media said.
The fire, which gutted a 28-storey building in China's commercial hub, was sparked by "unlicensed welding carried out contrary to rules," Xinhua, the official news agency, reported without citing a source.
The report did not say whether those detained were workers or managers. 
The swift arrests come as authorities tackle public concern over why the fire took more than four and a half hours to extinguish.
A second and even more deadly disaster transpired in New Delhi, when a tenement housing mostly migrant workers from India's eastern countryside collapsed, killing 64 people. Apparently, it might as well have been built on a swamp:
The cause of the collapse was not immediately clear, but suspicions immediately centered on this year’s heavy monsoon rains, the building’s location near a swollen river and shoddy, illicit construction.
“There is already a question mark on the legality of the construction of buildings in this area,” said Tajendra Khanna, the city’s lieutenant governor, and the owner of the building, Amrit Singh, was being sought for arrest.
 New Delhi has upwards of 15 million people, and some say it is poised to overtake Mumbai in the that arena if current rates persist. China's and India's big cities are swelling so rapidly they seem tragically overwhelmed and at a loss to keep up; these twin disasters are certainly symptoms of that.



Top: A high rise burns in Shanghai (AP) Bottom: Rescuers search for survivors in New Delhi (Adnan Abidi/Reuters)

Sunday, November 14, 2010

A New Faith

On Veterans' Day I was inspired to pluck the Civil War novel The Killer Angels by Michael Shaara off my shelf and began reading it. The book is enthralling and magnificently written. I attempted to read it once when I was 14, but I remember it only being a chore. Now, however, I can't put it down. Each page is so packed with deep brilliance and revelation, yet at the same time is spartan and to the point.
One passage I found fascinating and rather timely comes early in the book when Colonel Chamberlain of the 20th Maine Regiment is lost in thought:
He had grown up believing in America and the individual and it was a stronger faith than his faith in God.
...
But he was fighting for the dignity of man and in that way he was fighting for himself. If men were equal in America, all these former Poles and English and Czechs and blacks, then they were equal everywhere, and there was really no such thing as foreigners; there were only free men and slaves. And so it was not even patriotism but a new faith. The Frenchman may fight for France, but the American fights for mankind, for freedom; for the people, not the land.

 Photo: November 12th, 2010, U.S. Marines help their wounded comrade to a helicopter during a Medevac mission in southern Afghanistan's Helmand Province. (REUTERS/Peter Andrews)

Sometimes Creeps Do Look Like Creeps

CNN reports on developments in an ongoing missing persons case out of Ohio:



And witness accounts of the alleged perpetrator, Matthew J. Hoffman, now in custody, don't line up with the typical "he was normal but quiet" descriptions of men who turn out to be rapists and serial killer:
Donna Davis, who lives on the same street as the home where the girl was found, told WBNS Hoffman was a "weirdo" and that she made her children come indoors when he was outside.
 The rescued 13-year-old's brother, mother, and her mother's friend are still missing.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

The Sad Fate of the Discovered Native



Just when you think there are no more unexplored corners of the world, one suddenly presents itself. Oh, if these people only knew the fate that awaits them now, should the pattern that afflicts their cousins' remain the same.

Eric Cantor Flirts with Treason

Andrew Sullivan highlights a shocking trend among GOP congressional leaders:
It is not the first time that this kind of direct attack on the president's ability to conduct foreign policy has occurred under this administration. John McCain and Joe Lieberman have gone abroad to assure Israel that they will undermine their own president to advance the interests of a foreign country in a critical diplomatic discussion with the US on that country's soil. But Eric Cantor has gone one further, openly bragging about something he once described as a felony.
Eric Cantor, a US lawmaker, has given assurances to the leadership of a foreign nation, namely Israel, that he and his fellow party members are putting Israeli interests ahead of those of their own Commander-in-Chief. The same US politicians who would, during the previous administration, accuse any critic of the President of being a traitor are now promising the leaders of another country that they will actively work against the American President.

Aung San Suu Kyi Released

NPR reports:
Myanmar's military government freed its arch rival, democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, on Saturday after her latest term of detention expired. Several thousand jubilant supporters streamed to her residence.
Suu Kyi appeared at the gate to her home, smiling and dressed in a traditional Burmese jacket. "There is a time to be quiet and a time to talk," she told the  hundreds of cheering supporters. "People must work in unison. Only then can we achieve our goal," she said.
Al Jazeera gives some good historical context:



Is Myanmar edging closer to some semblance of democracy? Their recent elections might have been racked with fraud and accompanied by violent skirmishes with ethnic rebels, but it was the first national vote in two decades there. While their votes may not have counted this time around, perhaps a new generation of Burmese have acquired a taste for democracy that they will find hard to ignore until it is truly satiated.

(Photo: Suu Kyi greets the crowd outside her compound in Yangon. Getty Images)

Friday, November 12, 2010

For Women's Rights or for Politics?



On Wednesday, The United Nations launched UN Women, a new agency devoted to promoting and protecting women's rights around the world, with seats for 41 member nations. Many nations, including Nigeria, DR Congo, and Saudi Arabia applied and were granted seats on this new council. One notable and controversial exclusion was Iran, who applied as one of the 10 members from Asia but was replaced at the last minute by East Timor. The AFP reports:

"They lost and they lost handily," commented US ambassador Susan Rice on Iran's defeat.
"We have made no secret of our concern that Iran joining the board of UN Women would have been an inauspicious start to that board," she told reporters.
The claim of Iran's exclusion being due to their abysmal women's rights record would be easier to buy were it not for DR Congo's and especially Saudi Arabia's easily obtained seats on the council. The epidemic of mass rape in DR Congo would not seem to make the nation an exemplar of protecting women, and Saudi Arabia oppresses their female citizens to such a complete and inhuman degree (they are not allowed to even leave their own homes without the company of either a spouse or blood relative, and of course must remain covered when in public) its like the Islamic Kingdom is trying to win some bizarro Nobel prize for violating human rights.
This is not to diminish the suffering of Iran's women at all; from the Islamic dress code, to being banned from places like soccer matches, to unjust and cruel imprisonment and execution by stoning, the gross mistreatment of Iranian women is legendary and ongoing. But for the UN to imply that Iran's record is worse than a country like Saudi Arabia, the world leader in oppressing women, is just ridiculous. Iranian women outnumber men at universities, and, unlike Saudi Arabia, women in Iran are allowed to go pretty much where they choose, although not without hazarding threats from the Morality Police should a headscarf be out of place or a blouse be too formfitting.
It seems blatantly political that the UN would take care to keep Iran off this new council while accepting Saudi Arabia and DR Congo seemingly without issue. One must not ignore the ongoing sanctions against Iran, which today brought this development:
Nigeria has vowed to report Iran to the United Nations Security Council if Nigerian investigators find evidence that an apparently illegal arms shipment seized in Nigeria violated UN sanctions against the Islamic Republic.
 Is Iran's seemingly deliberate exclusion from UN Women yet another sanction against this moment's global pariah? If the United Nations prime concern here was truly protecting and advancing women's rights, then they would keep Saudi Arabia as far away from that council as possible.